Galaxy class model

m (Updating file links (automatic))

No edit summary

|(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)|

|Line 597:||Line 597:|

The debris was indeed re-utilized for the destruction of another ”Galaxy”-class vessel, the USS ”Odyssey” in “The Jem’Hadar”.Hutzel continued, “”My coordinator David Takemura combined these with pieces from kits to create a broken neck and dish for the ”Enterprise”.We also had a nacelle we were going to use, but it was stolen.”” The nacelle Hutzel referred to was replaced by the [[Miranda class model#Partial studio models|battle damaged ”Miranda”-class nacelle]], while the [[Constitution II class model#Battle-damaged motion picture model|”Constitution II”-class battle-damaged primary hull model]] was used for the saucer section.Takemura elaborated a bit further, ””Someone had the presence of mind to save the pieces and store them.

I took a piece of the bottom of the cigar section of the ”Enterprise”, did some kit bashing, and made a demolished version of the bottom of the ship.”” ({{ds9c|155}}) In post-production editing, in order to create the finalized scene, [[Pat Clancey]] at [[Digital Magic]] was responsible for aligning all the debris footage with those of the ”Enterprise” studio model, shot at Image G, while Animator [[Adam Howard]] combined these with stock footage of explosions and footage of the [[Jem’Hadar fighter]] in post-production editing.

|−||

As it turned out, one of the break-away models escaped being used and was afterwards retained by Ron B.Moore as part of his personal collection.

{{facebook|photo.php?fbid{{=}}10152655252863715&set{{=}}ecnf.679618714&type{{=}}3&theater}} Additional surviving copies were kept at Image G, as uncovered by Doug Drexler and Gary Hutzel.{{facebook|doug.drexler.7/media_set?set{{=}}a.10156977315326104&type{{=}}3}}

|+||

As it turned out, one of the break-away models escaped being used and was afterwards retained by Ron B.

Moore as part of his personal collection.{{facebook|photo.php?fbid{{=}}10152655252863715&set{{=}}ecnf.679618714&type{{=}}3&theater}} Additional surviving copies were kept at Image G, as uncovered by Doug Drexler and Gary Hutzel.

{{facebook|doug.drexler.7/media_set?set{{=}}a.10156977315326104&type{{=}}3}}

|+|

|+||

The remains of a screen-used break-away model were auctioned off, again by Prop Store Ltd., in 2023.

{{el|https://propstoreauction.com/lot-details/index/catalog/347/lot/113921}} The winning bidder being Mike Stoklasa of the Red Letter Media Youtube channel.{{YouTube|type=v|pLpxYMgQUT4}}

===Four-foot derivative ship class studio models===

Latest revision as of 22:57, 16 November 2023

(written from a

[Production point of view](/wiki/Memory_Alpha:Point_of_view))

Several

[studio models](/wiki/Studio_model) of the [Galaxy-class](/wiki/Galaxy_class) were created for [Star Trek: The Next Generation](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation), [Star Trek Generations](/wiki/Star_Trek_Generations), [Star Trek: Deep Space Nine](/wiki/Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine) and [Star Trek: Enterprise](/wiki/Star_Trek:_Enterprise).Two differently sized physical studio models were initially constructed for The Next Generation, to be joined by an intermediate sized one at a later stage.Advances in computer technology resulted in [CGI model](/wiki/CGI_model) versions of the class being introduced, first in Generations, and subsequently during the run of Deep Space Nine for use in that series and beyond.Apart from these, several specialty models were also constructed of the Galaxy-class, or its components, to fulfill specific functions when the need for those arose due to specific [script](/wiki/Script) requirements.Various Galaxy-class models appeared in both the series premieres of The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine, and the series finales of The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, [Star Trek: Voyager](/wiki/Star_Trek:_Voyager), and Enterprise, making it the only [Starfleet](/wiki/Starfleet) vessel of which external views were seen in all four spin-off television series, and the only one seen in all four finales.

Design

When it came time to design a new starship Enterprise for The Next Generation, history did not repeat itself.

Where

[Matt Jefferies](/wiki/Matt_Jefferies) had to produce hundreds of sketches to come up with the design direction for the original [USS Enterprise](/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701)), the main design work for the exterior of the [USS Enterprise-D](/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701-D)) was done long before another [Star Trek](/wiki/Star_Trek) television series had even been considered.

Design origins

In 1979, long before the new Star Trek series was announced,

[Andrew Probert](/wiki/Andrew_Probert), upon completion of his work on [Star Trek: The Motion Picture](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Motion_Picture), painted an illustration of a future starship concept, strictly for his own enjoyment.”I actually did a little painting (8″×5.6″) of a ship that would have been the Enterprise had I been able to take it fully in the direction I wanted to take it.That little painting became the basis for the Enterprise-D”, he recalled.

( [Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), accompanying booklet, p.

7) Elaborating, he later added:

“Having warp engines above the saucer always bothered me and I thought it made more sense to lower them closer to the ship’s center of mass.And, while I was at it, I thought, along with the saucer’s wide horizontal profile, the other main elements should also be wide and horizontal.So I sat down and said…”what if..I could design this ship the way I thought it should look”?”

In December 1985 he shortly revisited that painting and made some additional sketches, still for his own amusement, “Six years go by and I randomly produce this page of sketches in one of my sketchbooks.Obviously, I started with that “New Idea” above and, out of the blue, sketched up these couple of ideas in passing, little realizing that I’d be doing this for real, less than a year later.”

[[1]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://probertdesigns.com/Folder_DESIGN/ENT-D_Exterior.html (X) Probert later added:

“If you look at the original TV Enterprise, it had two long cylinders stuck to a stubby cylinder with flat sticks and a neck attached to a saucer, so you have many different design cross-sections.What I’ve attempted to do is unify the whole ship by giving everything the same sort of ovoid sculptural feeling, so it’s basically an industrial design.After seeing the initial sketches, Gene and the other producers liked my idea.

They actually played on it by rationalizing that in the future, our art forms will hopefully surpass our concern for technology.Therefore, we could design and build something that we were proud to fly around in; the technology being a given at this point.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 4], p.30)

Early November 1986, Probert secured an interview with

[Gene Roddenberry](/wiki/Gene_Roddenberry) for a position on the new show.Going home after the interview, Probert was so excited, that he could not restrain himself from turning out a new painting and additional sketches of the new Enterprise based on his initial design six years earlier:

“I was so pumped up that I started right in, sketching my little heart out.

Knowing that the new series was to be at least a hundred years hence (which later got changed to 85 years), I felt that it would be faster and probably sleeker if there was any influence from hyperlight dynamics.At least it should be more elegant, I felt.The saucer had, since its inception, been the main section, so I made it larger in proportion to the secondary or engineering hull.In previous designs the warp nacelles were always to the rear but above the saucer rim, which visually seemed to give them equal importance, and physically placed them above the ship’s center of mass.Both of these seemed to be negative point, which I hoped to remedy by lowering them to a position between the two hull sections.This would place them closer to the ship’s center of mass.

Also, the struts holding the saucer and warp engines were slanted in opposite directions; the saucer is going forward, engines going back.That wasn’t bad but it created a slight visual conflict, so I slanted them all forward to unify their direction and give the overall design a feeling of aggressive forward movement, like a lunging cat.The view from the front of the old ship produced a variety of shapes.

I took my design theme from the saucer and started sketching every component as a compressed oval.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], pp.50, 52)

Hired as the fifth member of the production team on 2 December 1986 in the capacity as Senior Illustrator, Probert’s initial job was designing the interiors of the new starship, especially the bridge.As inspiration he brought along some of his sketches of the exterior of his vision for the new Enterprise and hung them on his office wall.

While working on his bridge design, a lucky happenstance occurred when one of the producers walked into his office and saw one of his sketches, fondly remembered by Probert:

“

[David Gerrold]walked in one day and asked, “Is that the new Enterprise?” I told him that it was the direction that I wanted to go with it.He leaned over me, plucked it off the wall and said, “Let me borrow this a minute,” as he walked out.

I don’t think 15 minutes had passed when he returned when he returned with a smile on his face and said, “Yep, that’s it, they liked it.” As it turned out, Gerrold walked into Roddenberry’s office while the other two producers were there, held up my sketch and said, “What do you think of this?” They all liked it.”.( [Starlog photo guidebook Special Effects], Vol.5, 1996, p.100)

To which he added, “I was flabbergasted.I’d never heard of a design going through that quickly, and it was very close to what I ended up producing.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Magazine_Volume_1,_Issue_16), p.52)

All that remained was fine-tuning and filling in the details.

Refining the design

One of the first things Probert had to address was his misinterpretation of the

[saucer separation](/wiki/Saucer_separation) concept.Only referred to in the Original Series, this time around a saucer separation capability was from the very start envisioned for the new ship.

The producers’ idea behind this was, according to Executive Producer [Robert Justman](/wiki/Robert_Justman):

“(…) that we should have families on board.I said that it was unconscionable to expect people to go out into space for X number of years and leave everything they hold most dear behind them.Just because you’re on a space exploration, it doesn’t mean you have to give up your life.If you have loved ones, you have family, you should be able to enjoy and live and make your lives together, even though you’re out in space.(…)For that we provided for the separation capabilities, so that in case of danger or threat to the ship as a whole, if necessary we would send the

[saucer section]away under its own power.

Not warp power, but sufficient power to get it away while the [battle section]went to the fight.” ( [Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints], booklet, pp.10-11)

Yet a poor choice of wording in the preliminary briefing led Probert to misinterpret the producers’ intent:

“The way they described it was that the Enterprise would have a battle section that would separate from the ship.I thought, ‘Now you tell me!’ I’m thinking, ‘Hmm, a battle section that would leave the ship.’ I thought maybe it was like an auxiliary craft or something that separated to go off and fight battles.What I came up with was a shape like the letter D.

If you lay that down on top of the saucer with the round part toward the front and then extend the serifs, those would be two warp engines.

This thing would be nestled into the top of the saucer and it would separate to go fight the battles.

When I showed this to them they said, “No, no.What’ll happen is the saucer separates and the engineering hull then becomes the battle section.” So I have this dorsal sculpted into the saucer and now I have to separate that and still make it look good both ways, which was an extraordinary challenge.I started playing with it and I found if I left part of the saucer on the dorsal then it could be a very broad mounting point for the saucer as well as hopefully making the engineering hull look a little better.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], pp.52-53)

Coincidentally, Probert’s original concept of “an auxiliary craft or something that separated to go off and fight battles”, was later re-visited in the design of the

[Prometheus-class](/wiki/Prometheus_class).

Probert originally intended the saucer section to have landing feet, much like he had envisioned for his redesign of the

[Constitution II-class](/wiki/Constitution_II_class) for [Star Trek: The Motion Picture](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Motion_Picture):

“Popular opinion indicated that the two triangular points on the underside of the saucer [remark: of the Original Series

[USS Enterprise]] are actually two landing legs; the third one would be in the dorsal cavity, so the saucer would have tricycle [landing gear]for planet landing.

Carrying that into Star Trek: The Motion Picture Enterprise I designed four landing pads on the underside of the saucer.When I did the D, I started to do that and was distracted away from it and that poor ship eventually paid the price!” ( [Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], p.53)

Explaining some of the thought processes behind the fine-tuning process, Probert stated in regard to the vertical windows in the saucer section:

“They would scale out to about three and a half feet across and their length would vary according to what deck they were on.The way that I came up with that originally was that, if you think of a porthole on an ocean liner, it’s usually set at an average height of around five feet, so any normal-sized person could look out of it.I started with that, but because the walls on the saucer are slanted at such a radical angle my thinking was, “Where do you put the porthole so everybody, short or tall, could look out?” The solution I came up with was to have a vertical porthole so people of any size could use it.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], pp.

55-56)

As to the armaments of the new vessel he elaborated:

“In classic Star Trek the phasers came from the Special Effects department.They had nothing to do with any feature on the outside of the original Enterprise.The

[phasers]came out of the [photon torpedo]tube and vice versa: very confusing.When we did Star Trek: The Motion Picture, I felt it was important to give the effects animators as well as the audience an understanding of where the armament was on the Enterprise.So, I designed the bubble housings for the [phaser banks].

When it came to do Star Trek: The Next Generation, I started thinking about today’s navy, particularly the [Enterprise aircraft carrier], which has a reason for its square island and its four huge radar antennae that don’t turn like the old radar antennae do.They’re mounted to cover the four quadrants of the space around the carrier.And I got thinking that having little electronic turrets or phaser bubbles on the feature Enterprise was starting to look a little archaic.I thought it would be interesting to encircle vast areas of the ship with one single phaser strip, whereby the computer would be able to determine from a moving target what would be the most optimum angle to fire at the target.

So if the Enterprise was passing a moving target, the phaser beam would visually walk around the strip as the computer continually updated that angle of fire.”

He added in regard to reducing the number of forward firing photon torpedo launchers from two to one, “I figured that advanced technology would allow a single photon tube to reload faster, plus it didn’t make any bulgy things on the side of my dorsal.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), booklet, p.

During the refinement stage, Probert, in conjuncture with Roddenberry, also worked out some basic specifications for the new ship:

“Roddenberry already liked the direction in which the Enterprise design was going and I took the opportunity to propose that we double the ship’s length to 2,000 feet.Roddenberry thought that was rather large but after we talked about the extra personnel, families, holodecks, larger shuttles, longer missions, etc., he agreed.I added a series of visible lifeboat covers (as opposed to graphic markings on the movie Enterprise) to the ship which alluded to the ship’s capacity of 3,500.

He felt that too many extras (people) would be needed to reflect a complement of that many, so he established it as 1,100.Later on 1,012 became the official ship’s complement.” (

[Starlog photo guidebook Special Effects], Vol.5, 1996, pp.

107-108)

At this stage Probert shortly toyed with the idea of having his new ship a modular structure, before that was abandoned.

Gene Roddenberry asked only for two modifications to Probert’s final design.He wanted to restore the bridge to its position on the top of the saucer section, which Probert had originally placed in the center of the saucer feeling “that in a ship that size, the bridge, being the center of command, should be in the center” and that “it would still have the electronic visual capabilities” with the added consideration that it would have been well protected.Roddenberry and Justman felt that the ship’s defensive capabilities were able enough to protect the bridge no matter where it was placed even as exposed as it was on top of the saucer and they also wanted to allow viewers to be able to scale the rest of the ships in their minds.The other modification Roddenberry asked for was to extend the nacelles, which Probert had slanted forward in order to create the visual impression of a “lunging cat”, so that they had similar proportions to the original Enterprise.(

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), booklet, pp.7-8) The modification of the nacelles increased the overall length of the Galaxy class to 2,108 feet, as is adhered to in most reference works, among others the [Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Technical_Manual).

While addressing Roddenberry’s requests, one of the last features Probert turned his attention to was the underside of the saucer section:

“In the original show the dome on the bottom of the ship was a

[sensor array].

What I did was move the sensor array to more of a surrounding detail, leaving the dome on the bottom free.That’s where I put the [captain’s yacht], which is a private vessel for dignitaries and [captains]of ships to use as personal [shuttles].That was never used in the show.At one point there was a script where [Picard]was returning to the ship and the dialogue was, “The captain’s shuttle is on the way back.Crew members, man your stations.” Then the captain comes aboard.We never ever have a visual, so I suggested mentioning the yacht, but they decided against it.” ( [Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], p.55)

Though the concept of an embedded captain’s yacht was further explored in the Next Generation Technical Manual, in which the vessel was christened

[Calypso](/wiki/Calypso) and was also envisioned to be a feature on the [USS Voyager](/wiki/USS_Voyager) in the form of the [Aeroshuttle](/wiki/Aeroshuttle).The concept was only firmly established in [Star Trek: Insurrection](/wiki/Star_Trek:_Insurrection) on the [USS Enterprise](/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701-E)) in the form of the [Cousteau](/wiki/Cousteau_(yacht)).

After final approval of the design a set of six-view orthographic working drawings were made to be sent to the outside contractor that was to build the studio model.

[design patent](/wiki/Star_Trek_design_patents), No.

D307923, was issued to [Paramount Pictures](/wiki/Paramount_Pictures) by the US Patent and Trademark Office for the USS Enterprise-D on 15 March 1990 (there described as “The ornamental design for a toy spaceship”), which noted Andrew Probert as the sole “inventor”, correctly in this case, of the design.Probert’s earlier patents for the starships in The Motion Picture were cited as past references, as was the [USS Reliant](/wiki/USS_Reliant_(NCC-1864)).The patent application was tendered by the studio on 23 September 1987, valid for fourteen years when issued.

ILM and study models

Once the design phase for the new Enterprise, to serve as the main vessel for the new The Next Generation series, had become final, tenders got out to solicit bids in order to build two studio models.”Once we got all the working drawings for the exterior of the ship, I put up it out for bids to a number of optical special effects houses, including

[Industrial Light & Magic](/wiki/Industrial_Light_%26_Magic) (ILM), [Apogee](/wiki/Apogee,_Inc.), and DreamQuest.All of them received copies of the main title sequence and a list of library shots which we would need for various episodes.Of the five we contacted, four were in the Los Angeles area; only ILM was out of town, up in Marin County.”, Justman recalled.( [Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), booklet, p.9)

Yet, ILM was able to secure the commission, due to the fact that they were able to tender a bid that was below par as the company was between jobs.

“‘What they decided was to make a bare-bones bid, enough to keep their doors open and keep everyone on that they needed.Oh, it was a tremendous bid.

I couldn’t believe it was so cheap! But it was ILM, you know? The best in the business!”, Justman exclaimed.(

[Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Companion_(3rd_edition)) (3rd ed., p.

12))

Still, no matter what deal was offered to the company, Model Shop Supervisor

[Jeff Mann](/wiki/Jeff_Mann) had to contend with differences between the franchise’s movie productions and TV productions:

“In the past, we had always dealt with the movie division – people like

[Harve Bennett]and [Ralph Winter]– but this was a whole new group of people working on the TV series and they weren’t familiar with our involvement in Star Trek movie FX – that is, what we do and how we do it.So, the new producing team came up and we had a show and tell session.We got out all the Star Trek movie models so they could see what they looked like close up, how they were built and how they operated.In this way, we were able to give them an idea of what different things cost.

I’m sure they went through a similar process for all of the companies that they visited for FX bids.

“Of course, everybody does things slightly differently, we all have our own methods and systems.For us, it was an education process to determine the producers’ needs and discuss how they were to be satisfied.At that point, the only thing under discussion was building the ship.We would not be shooting it.Our bid was based on the very specific requirements that Andy Probert’s ideas would be interpreted exactly – we were to build that ship as drawn.

“This was a very different way of working for us, and in a way, harder.I think our real strength at ILM is art direction and the interchange of ideas as a project develops.When working with

[David Carson], [Nilo Rodis-Jamero]or Joe Johnston, for example, as art directors, they’ll have an idea which they sketch out and one of us may come back and suggest that we need to twist this a little bit, or how about something more like this…It’s very much a collaborative process.

“But the Star Trek people had already nailed down all of their ideas and concepts for the Enterprise, and Andy Probert was very knowledgeable as to why certain features of the Enterprise are the way they are.

It wasn’t just a matter of pretty design, his detailing is very functional.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2], p.28)

Once ILM was chosen, the producers sent the company the orthographic drawings they had prepared.It was up to

[Gregory Jein](/wiki/Gregory_Jein), employed at ILM at the time, to come up with a [concept model](/wiki/Study_model) to show if the intent was understood.A clay study model was presented to the producers and it was then that Probert realized that orthographic views were not sufficient and a more hands-on approach was needed.”The first thing that they had sent us was a two-foot [maquette](/wiki/Maquette) based on the drawings that we had sent up.

The only thing that I had guessed wrong, in defining the shape of the ship from six views, was the shape of the wing as seen from the top and bottom.I felt the most important profile was the side view.Looking at the wing top or bottom produced a different wing shape than seen from the side.”, to which Jein added, “Once we got the drawings and the approval, after all the bids from all the other companies came in, ILM got the contract.

Jeff Mann was the head of the model shop at that time, and I was the lead man on the patterns.So we just interpreted Andy’s drawings as best as we could.”.( [Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), accompanying booklet, p.9) [Doug Drexler](/wiki/Doug_Drexler) remembered seeing the study model after he was hired on the show: “Bob had just gotten done showing me Greg Jein’s little five inch maquette of the Enterprise-D.

It was the first time I laid eyes on the new configuration.I remember all the little windows being penciled, and I remember Bob’s obvious pride in the design.”Not a straight line on it,” he enthused, referring to the ships curvy appearance.Curves meant that the show had a substantially better budget than in 1966.” [[2]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/in-praise-of-mike http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/in-praise-of-mike

Adopting the hands-on approach from then on, Probert kept in very close contact with the model shop of ILM during the build of the two models.

A second clay study model was commissioned (constructed around a carton skeletal structure for internal integrity), this time as a two-part model to reflect the saucer separation capability.This time the model followed more closely the lines of the ship Probert had in mind.By the time the model was delivered to the producers, construction on the larger studio model had already started.(

[Star Trek: The Next Generation – The Continuing Mission](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_-_The_Continuing_Mission), pp.18-20) Again built by Jein, this version was presented in person by an ILM representative to Roddenberry at his Paramount office for his approval, after which the model was used by [John Knoll](/wiki/John_Knoll) to test out his [below-mentioned](/wiki/Galaxy_class_model#Going-to-warp_sequences) “slit-scan” technique.Not seen for decades afterwards, the study model resurfaced in the collection of ScienceFictionArchives.com, an European organization that is dedicated to preserve science fiction production assets for public display purposes, such as in museums.[[3]]http://www.sciencefictionarchives.com/fr/collections/514/maquette-originale-de-pre-production-du-vaisseau-uss-enterprise-d-de-star-trek-la-nouvelle-generation The whereabouts of the first concept model though, remain unknown.

Once given the go-ahead, a second set of one-to-one scale working drawings of the six-foot model were prepared and sent to ILM, and from then on the model-shop was on a tight schedule.”They called us on a Friday.

They said, “OK, we accept your price to build the ship; we want you to start on Monday and build it in 10 weeks.” I said 12 weeks.I knew what it took to build other ships, and I knew that this one would be more difficult.”, Mann remembered.(

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2](/wiki/The_Official_Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Magazine_issue_2), p.

30) First order of business for Mann was composing the team that was to build the two models.

As lead modelers he chose Greg Jein (as pattern or master lead) and [Ease Owyeung](/wiki/Ease_Owyeung).The team was further filled out by [Sean Casey](/wiki/Sean_Casey), [Bill Concannom](/wiki/Bill_Concannom), [Bill George](/wiki/Bill_George), [Wesley Seeds](/wiki/Wesley_Seeds), [Larry Tan](/wiki/Larry_Tan), and [Howie Weed](/wiki/Howie_Weed), while [Steve Gawley](/wiki/Steve_Gawley) was given the task of preparing the [Excelsior-class studio model](/wiki/Excelsior_class_model), for its re-use.( [The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2](/wiki/The_Official_Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Magazine_issue_2), pp.31, 40)

Six-foot model

Awarded the contract to build two differently sized physical studio models of the Enterprise-D for the new The Next Generation television show, ILM faced some problems where the larger of the two was concerned, the one that was to be known as the “six-foot model”.As Model Shop Supervisor Jeff Mann recalled:

“The principal difficulties with this model were: First, this Enterprise has a detachable saucer; and second, the shape is very flat, which makes it difficult to mount – that is, the center-of-gravity was positioned so that it couldn’t be supported easily.

Also, when you have someone specifying the paint scheme and windows so very specifically, as Andy Probert did, it takes much more time – you have to be very careful and plan things out.”The ships we did for the Star Wars movies were much looser.The art director would say that he wanted this kind of a look with this paint job and panels.

We have a way of detailing the ships with a team of guys – sort of like a quilting bee.Using airbrushes and pre-etched brass stencils, we move around the ship in a somewhat random pattern.It’s like an impressionistic painting when you stand back, turn your head sideways and squint.It works.

It’s very subtle and it helps the scale.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2], pp.30-31)

Build

After receiving large one-to-one scale orthographic working drawings for the six-feet model from the studio, construction started on Monday

[2 March](/wiki/2_March) [1987](/wiki/March_1987).First thing to be addressed was the solving of the center-of-gravity challenge, which Owyeung had to tackle in the manufacture of the machine shopped aluminum armature framework.Mann explained:

“The armature was really a difficult problem, which had to be solved right away, because, of course, everything is built around the armature.The old Enterprise has a nose mount in the center of its body – no mounts are on the dish, but right about the center of gravity, there are mounts going out each side and the bottom and the rear, The new Enterprise is generally a flat ship since the engine nacelles don’t stick up and the saucer is elliptical; the ship is very nose heavy because of the enormous elliptical dish, which puts the center of gravity somewhere up in the neck and dish area.We had to come up with a a really complicated armature that would allow us to shoot the ship from all positions – both together and then split apart, because this new Enterprise is essentially two ships.In concept, we would be dealing with 12 mounting points.

“Ease came up with a pretty simple method that involved mounting the dish on the top or bottom and making the armature strong enough so that even if you grab it at one end with the other end of the ship just cantilevered, it would still hold.On our other ships, the saucer has an edge which is about two or three inches thick, so it would be possible to pop a panel off and run a mount arm in.

But on this design, the saucer tapers down to almost a point – maybe a quarter of an inch.To run a mount arm in, we would need to do much more than pop in a panel, we would have to take a section out of pie out, and then we couldn’t shoot the model from the top or bottom.

“Ease designed a mount arm that emerges out of the dish’s top or bottom and makes a right turn, it is structurally sound enough to support the entire ship – and this [is] the heaviest ship we ever built.There is another mount at the neck and others at the bottom, the rear and the front of the body.So, I guess there are six different mount points that allow you to shoot from any direction.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2], pp.

31-32)

In the meantime, while Owyeung was solving the question of the structural integrity of the model, Greg Jein turned his attention to the manufacture of the masters or patterns of the model from which molds were to be taken for the casting of the parts, that were to be used to construct the final model.Mann elaborated further:

“Jein’s basic approach was to use station points on Probert’s drawings to create sectional ribs out of Plexiglas.Styrofoam was used to to fill in the gaps and

[Bondo]was laid over the surface, It took a lot of hand work to sand down the Bondo down to the ribs.”For the elliptical dish we had a side view and a front view, but everything in between wasn’t drawn.

So, we got the computer graphics boys in, which we thought would be a really fast way to get the sectional views we needed.But it turned out that their schedule and ours wouldn’t work out.Greg said, “I’ll do it!” and he came up with a way of shortening each rib – he must have made at least 100 of them, and he had to do it for the top and the bottom of the saucer.”

To which Jein added, “My main concern was getting the shell to the right contour.On my first attempt, I thought I could get by with fewer station points, but the curve was so complex that the shape began to dip.On the second try, I made enough station points so that it was practically a solid mass front to center.

I filled in the rest with rigid polyfoam and finished off the surface in Bondo, which was sanded down to the Plexiglas station points.” Once sculpted, the master’s surfaces were imprinted with details or, as Jein put it:

“If you’re going to the trouble of creating a pattern, taking a silicon mold and making casts in fiberglass resin, every casting should come out of that mold relatively finished, rather than casting a simple shape and having to detail every casting.Once it was formed and shaped, we used a mixture of Bondo, glass cloth and polyester resin to harden the surface.Then, when we got this nice smooth surface, we laid down

[Letraset]tapes in three smallest gauges in a cross contour all over the ship’s surface.Once the tape was down in a position we liked, we sprayed the model with an automotive primer and peeled it up before it cured, thereby leaving a depression in the paint.It’s like a reverse stencil; it allows us to make corrections by just moving the tape, rather than inscribing into the model and having to correct that.” ( [The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2], p.32)

After Jein’s team had applied all the tapes onto the master and inscribing additional details into it, mostly to indicate where all the windows were to be positioned, liquidized silicone rubber, after an intermediate process to stabilize the master, was poured over the master.After solidifying the rubber was pulled off the master, resulting in a negative mold.

These molds then served as a tool into which heated glass reinforced plastic was poured.Vacuformed, i.e.the air sucked out of the space between the mold and the plastic to achieve a perfect fit, this eventually resulted after cooling off in a cast, once the flexible mold was pulled off, to be used to construct the final model with.The resin chosen was transparent, as after application of the paint layers, details such as the windows then could be showcased by merely scraping away the paint layers and/or removing the masking tape on those applicable places where the internal neon lighting was supposed to shine through.

(

[Sci-Fi & Fantasy Models](/wiki/Sci-Fi_%26_Fantasy_Models), issue 29, pp.52-53)

Establishing the color for the Galaxy-class

As the build of the six-foot model was nearing its completion, Probert turned his attention to giving the model its color, like his predecessor Jefferies had done with the original Enterprise.Probert had a specific goal in mind when deciding upon the color scheme, “When I did the Enterprise-D, in my attempt at easing the visual move into a new shape Enterprise, looking [at] a lot of footage of classic Star Trek and all of the Enterprise flybys, I specified the color to be very subtle shades of blues and greens.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D_Blueprints), booklet, p.8) Probert’s intent was to approximate the bluish hue as it was seen on screen in the original run of The Original Series:

“The fans were very concerned that we were replacing the original series.

In order to soften some of that anxiety I wanted the two ships to be colored basically the same.

Well, because of the low degree of technology compared to today, when the original Enterprise (which was actually a warm pearl gray) was filmed it picked up a lot of the blue spill [light used in the visual effects process] and therefore became bluish.What I did was indicate that the paneling of the D be painted in two shades of blue.One is a duck egg blue, and the other is kind of a sky blue, which is the base color the hobby kits are molded in.

By mixing the two blues together I was hoping cinematically that there would be a close tie-in with the color of the original ship.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 16], p.56)

The paneling Probert referred to was the re-introduction of the “Aztec-paneling”, the interlocking hull plate pattern on the saucer section originally conceived for the Motion Picture Enterprise in order to ease some of the concerns as worded by later appointed Visual Effects Supervisor

[Dan Curry](/wiki/Dan_Curry): “But when we photographed the big ship very smooth, we couldn’t tell the difference between it and a very small ship very smooth, because photographically, particularly on television and in order to create that sense of scale and hugeness, we needed three-dimensional relief, something to cast shadows.” Eventually Curry’s concerns were only partially met due to time restraints.

He further recalled:

“On the six-foot model, another two months would have gotten us the detail I wanted, but I had to be practical.We had to get the model photographed and into the show.Although the use of the blue and green paneling worked well, I also asked for more “weathering”, to make the surface more believable, even though we’re reasonably sure that there’s no weathering in space, no grease stains, no oxidation like you would have have on an airplane.When you have a completed model like that and it’s painted and it looks pristine, it’s not believable because it’s pristine.It needs a certain patchiness to it, and the more detail you can get into a miniature, the more believable it’s going to look” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints], booklet, p.9)

The “hobby kits” Probert referred to was

[AMT/Ertl](/wiki/AMT) [model kit](/wiki/Star_Trek_model_kits) No.

6619 that was released within a year of the show’s first airing.

AMT, for whom Probert concurrently served as a consultant [[4]]https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/observations/boobytrap.htm, maintained close contact with the Art Department as their painting instructions proved to be highly accurate.A pre-production evaluation model was sent to the studio and ended up as display piece in various episodes (see below).How close this contact was, was evidenced by the fact that they unwittingly copied an in-joke one of the modelers performed on the studio model.Detailing the numerous panels onto the model was drawn-out and tedious work, and one of the modelers, no doubt in a mood of tediousness, arranged some of the panels to read “Ugly”.Never discernible on screen, it was dutifully carried over onto AMT’s instruction-sheet.( [Sci-Fi & Fantasy Models](/wiki/Sci-Fi_%26_Fantasy_Models), issue 29, p.54)

Probert has given a detailed overview of the colors he has used on an archived version of his

website http://probertdesigns.com/Folder_DESIGN/ENT-D_Exterior2.html , specified as follows:

|Galaxy-class color scheme|

|Part||PMS

|[[2]](#cite_note-2) FS-24516 FS-15526 [Navigational deflector](/wiki/Navigational_deflector)Dish FS-22246 FS-10115 [Lifeboat](/wiki/Escape_pod)Covers FS-36595 [Sensor Strips](/wiki/Sensor_array) FS-35450 FS-36270 FS-36307 FS-34201 [RCS](/wiki/Reaction_control_system)Housings FS-23564 FS-25065 FS-21105 FS-22203 FS-33538 FS-35231

– notes:

[↑](#cite_ref-1) Pantone Colors [↑](#cite_ref-2)Color samples courtesy of Colorserver.net

When Probert saw the first footage of the model shot under studio conditions, he was surprised that the result was the exact opposite of what he had intended.

The intense studio lights blurred the color scheme into an overall gray color (as it did when still-photographed with flashlights; – see picture below of the “anti-time” variant of the four-foot model), ironically making the model approximate the appearance of the original Enterprise model as it was under flat-lit conditions.Though to date, no production confirmation has ever been forthcoming supporting the assertion, Probert has always been under the impression that this had been done on purpose.”For some unknown reason, however,…those colors were intentionally neutralized when the miniature was filmed, reducing it to the ranks of yet another gray spaceship.And this dis-coloring was perpetuated in subsequent movies.”

[[5]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://probertdesigns.com/Folder_DESIGN/ENT-D_Exterior2.html http://probertdesigns.com/Folder_DESIGN/ENT-D_Exterior2.html .Nevertheless, this color scheme has been adhered to for the remainder of the series and has been carried over to the later four-foot model as well as to the contemporary [Nebula-class studio model](/wiki/Nebula_class_model).

Production use

| [D’Kora-class model](/wiki/D%27Kora_class_model)

Upon completion, the model, measuring 78 × 59½ × 14½ inches, was retained at ILM, as the company by that time had secured additional rights to shoot stock footage, especially

Motion control photography, of the model and the going-to- [warp](/wiki/Warp) sequences for the pilot episode ” [Encounter at Farpoint](/wiki/Encounter_at_Farpoint_(episode))”.The model was delivered on schedule, “(…)and we actually started shooting the ship on June 1.”, newly appointed Visual Effects Supervisor [Robert Legato](/wiki/Robert_Legato) confirmed ( [Starlog](/wiki/Starlog_(magazine)), issue 132, p.55).

Usage was made of the six-feet model since then, in providing additional stock footage at [Image G](/wiki/Image_G) until the advent in 1989 of the four-foot model in ” [The Defector](/wiki/The_Defector_(episode))”, though the stock footage shot up until then was utilized throughout the remainder of the series.As the production staff had decided upon a relatively small class of only six vessels in service, no other Galaxy-class vessels were called upon to make an appearance during the run of TNG, with the exception of the [USS Yamato](/wiki/USS_Yamato) (NCC-71807), which was represented using stock footage of the Enterprise-D.The Star Trek: Encyclopedia mentions that [Michael Okuda](/wiki/Michael_Okuda) made decals for the Yamato for its appearance in ” [Contagion](/wiki/Contagion_(episode))”, but it is unclear whether the six-foot model was relabeled or if the decals were created for the debris seen in that episode.( [Star Trek Encyclopedia](/wiki/Star_Trek_Encyclopedia_(3rd_edition)) (3rd ed., p.569))

Less than a year later, in 1990, Robert Legato’s visual effects team was forced to pull the six-foot model back from retirement for use in the

[season four](/wiki/TNG_Season_4) episode ” [The Best of Both Worlds, Part II](/wiki/The_Best_of_Both_Worlds,_Part_II_(episode))”.The script specified that the Enterprise-D performed a battle maneuver that involved a saucer separation for which stock footage was not sufficient and the large model was the only one that was constructed to do so.Having quickly become accustomed to the easier to handle four-foot model, which was on top of it also outfitted with an easier to operate lighting rig, the team was less than enthusiastic of having to work with the larger, more unwieldy six-foot model again.Having to handle the large model again, “(…) proved to us what a pain that model really was to shoot.”, an evidently terse Legato commented.

( [Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 22, issue 2, p.34) Legato was not alone in his assessment.Close co-worker, Visual Effects Coordinator [Gary Hutzel](/wiki/Gary_Hutzel), had issues with the model too, as he reminisced in 2012, “The original 1701-D Enterprise, which we received from ILM, they constructed at ILM, was a very sophisticated model for its time.My understanding was it cost approximately $75,000 to have constructed.

It had very complex internal lighting systems and very elaborated animated elements in the foreground nacelles and all that.

When we received it, the first thing that struck was that it was gigantic.The saucer was an oval, so it was very wide, it was made of fiberglass and aluminum framing, and it was constructed in such a way that the saucer could separate from the main body.So, it was a very, very heavy model.

It took anywhere between four and six people to pick of off its stand and reorient it for any of the shots we had to do.So, it was very, very heavy and in addition it was very complex.It had fourteen separate, high-voltage neon light circuits in it, which I had to rig every time we had to shoot it.And I wish I had a dime for every time that sucker shocked the bejeebers out of me when we were going to plug it in, or unplug it, because we get an arc from that high-voltage source.” ( [TNG Season 3 Blu-ray](/wiki/TNG_Season_3_Blu-ray)-special feature, “The Trek Not Taken”)

Four years later, the services of the six-foot model were called upon yet again for appearance in

[Star Trek Generations](/wiki/Star_Trek_Generations).The only other alternative, the four-foot model, was not an option as it was too small for the big screen and was still in use for television productions.Most importantly, it was not capable of saucer separation and the script for the movie required one.When hauled out of storage and delivered to ILM, it became clear that the model needed a refurbishment to meet big screen requirements.Visual Effects Art Director Bill George, who was part of the original construction team seven years earlier came full circle, when he again had to work with the model:

“I have to admit, when I first saw the Next Generation’s Enterprise, I didn’t like it much, but it has definitely grown on me.

I view most of the Star Trek ships as Art Deco – they’re very simple shapes put together – but I think the Next Generation ship is more Art Nouveau.Quite frankly, it was a very difficult model to build because of that.

It’s definitely the next stage, and it’s more organic.There are some things I’ve always wanted to do to that Enterprise, but Rick Berman just wanted us to give it a facelift.

I wanted to change the paint job, because we didn’t have a lot of time to paint it when we built the model back in 1987, and the green and blue color scheme didn’t read on television.Rick agreed, since the six-foot model was pretty beat up.We stripped off all the paint and decals and Bondoed all the dents and scrapes where the motion-control camera had run into it.We took the color more toward a battleship grey, and also, per John Knoll, added some glossy areas because he liked the tiled look of the original Enterprise.

When there’s raking light across it, you can see that paneled look and it’s really beautiful.” (

[American Cinematographer], January 1995, p.79)

Once Berman came around to his way of thinking, George added, “Rick said that people who watch the show have fallen in love with the Enterprise, and when they see it in the theater, they should fall in love with it all over again.” With regard to the glossy highlights which so bedeviled camera teams in filming The Motion Picture Enterprise, George clarified, “Now that we’ve entered the digital realm, we don’t have the same enormous problems we once did with blue spill.John Knoll felt that adding these glossy areas – where there would be glints of reflected light – would really help the scale.Embellishments, such as the accentuation of numerous emergency “lifeboats” visible in relief along the hull and scale graphics identifying each of them, provided additional detail.” (

[Cinefex](/wiki/Cinefex), issue 61, p.70)

Replacing the paint scheme was not the only thing that had to be tackled.Years of storage had taken its toll as Model Supervisor

[John Goodson](/wiki/John_Goodson) clarified:

“I think there were an average of about three people for about twelve weeks to refurbish this model.We took the thing completely apart and replaced a lot of the missing neons or neons that were broken on it, rewired the engines, went into it, did a lot of cosmetic body work to it.It was like an old car when it showed up.

It had a lot of things that were broken, the front of the engines were falling off, the impulse engines were gone.

We did a whole new paint job on it, which was about two months worth of painting, because we kept masking and masking and masking.We actually kept all the masking tape of it, and it ended up as a ball this big.

[Goodson spreading his arms wide to indicate the size]” (

[Star Trek Generations (Special Edition)] [DVD]-special feature, “Inside ILM: Models And Miniatures”)

Despite considerable efforts of ILM to outfit the six-foot model with a new livery, unexpected reuse of stock footage of the model originally shot for “

[Encounter at Farpoint](/wiki/Encounter_at_Farpoint_(episode))” turned up in Generations.The first use was an establishing shot just prior to the scene in [stellar cartography](/wiki/Stellar_cartography), while the second was a view of the underside of the ship during the saucer separation.As the model had been refurbished for the movie, its use constituted a continuity breach.”This created a problem later on, when [Berman](/wiki/Rick_Berman) & [Lauritson](/wiki/Peter_Lauritson) decided to save 12 cents and reuse a stock TNG flyby from the pilot for Generations (right before the [Data](/wiki/Data)/Picard cartography scene) …for that shot, you’ve got a very old ship element that they had to tweak like crazy to get it looking like the repainted D, not all that successfully.And it wasn’t even ILM who recomp[osit]ed that shot, it was Jeff Matakovich (sp?), who did it as an optical, not a digital comp.”, Kevin H.

Martin (author of the feature article in Cinefex) recalled.[[6]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/4-footer-vs-6-footer/#comment-2770 http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/4-footer-vs-6-footer/#comment-2770 When interviewed by Martin, Visual Effects Supervisor [Ronald B.

Moore](/wiki/Ronald_B._Moore) justified the decision, “The production decided to reuse a couple of stock Enterprise-D shots from the series.It was a matter of time and money; but, in truth, there was no reason not to use them.

So we dug up some shots ILM had done for the pilot episode.They were generic shots, and we had comped them a lot of times.We considered the recompositing of these shots on the computer, but since the elements had been shot Vistavision, I suggested that we have them done optically by Jeff Matakovich at Optical Illusions.” Admitting there was more work involved than originally envisioned, he continued, “The film had more weave and motion than we liked; so, very quickly and economically, Jeff made cover mattes and assembled the comps.” ( [Cinefex](/wiki/Cinefex), issue 61, pp.69-70) Nevertheless, it constituted the very first time that Probert’s carefully laid out color scheme became somewhat discernible on-screen, years before the later The Next Generation [remastering](/wiki/Remaster) efforts.

Its use in Star Trek Generations, proved to be the last time the six-foot studio model was ever used as a production asset.

The shot of the saucer section breaking through the cloud cover of

[Veridian III](/wiki/Veridian_III) was the last shot of the model seen in a Star Trek production.

After shooting, the model for Generations had been modified to have the registry read “USS Enterprise NCC-1701-E”.It befuddled

[Penny Juday](/wiki/Penny_Juday), then archivist at Paramount Pictures, who had no explanation for this change as she uncrated the model for the [TNG Season 2 DVD](/wiki/TNG_Season_2_DVD)-special feature, “Inside the Starfleet Archives” on 19 October 2001.However, the change was done at ILM by Goodson prior to crating up the model after completion of Generations.He assumed that the new Enterprise might be a Galaxy-class ship as well and changed over the number to save whoever would do the special effects the trouble of having to change it over themselves.

( [Industrial Light & Magic: Into the Digital Realm](/wiki/Industrial_Light_%26_Magic:_Into_the_Digital_Realm), p.60)

Post-production use

Relabeled back to “NCC-1701-D”, known as

Lot 712, part of the [40 Years of Star Trek: The Collection](/wiki/40_Years_of_Star_Trek:_The_Collection) [auction](/wiki/Star_Trek_auctions) and estimated at US$25,000-$35,000, the six-foot model was eventually sold on 7 October 2006 with a winning bid of US$500,000 ($576,000 including buyer’s premium).The model, still carrying the battle damage scars applied at ILM for its last appearance, eventually became the highest priced lot of he auction.Incindentally, when taking the undisclosed seller’s premium for the sevices of the auction house into account, this actually constituted pure profit (roughly an inflation adjusted gross profit of US$190,000 in 1987 prices) for the franchise as the model, constructed at the above-mentionded cost of US$75,000, was completely written off as a production asset.

The model was acquired by Microsoft’s co-founder

Paul Allen for his Science Fiction Museum and Hall of Fame in Seattle – now known as the Museum of Pop Culture (MoPop) – , [[7]]http://hobbytalk.com/bbs1/showthread.php?t=187942 though it was initially not put on display due to space limitations in the museum.

It eventually resurfaced as part of the Star Trek: Exploring New Worlds [exhibition](/wiki/Star_Trek_exhibitions), when it was displayed at MoPop from 21 May 2016 to 28 May 2018 [[8]]http://thestranger.com/events/23561451/star-trek-exploring-new-worlds, becoming subsequently a touring exhibition.[[9]]http://mopop.org/exhibitions-plus-events/traveling-exhibitions/star-trek-exploring-new-worlds [[10]]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty8aHbO1q3g [[11]]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2s6KwCsoEM

Two-foot model

Fully aware of the fact that the six-foot model was to be a large, hard-to-handle model, the producers, taking a cue from their predecessor, decided to have ILM build a smaller two-foot model of the Enterprise-D as well for the new The Next Generation television show, for

forced perspective shots where detailed views were less of an issue.

Build

Because of this, the small model needed less detailing, less elaborate lighting, and also did not need to be capable of saucer separation.This made it easier to build for the crew, who followed essentially the same building methodology as with the six-foot model.Unlike its predecessor, the

[three-foot Constitution-class studio model](/wiki/Constitution_class_model_(original)#Three-foot_model), which was originally only intended as study model and for public relations purposes, the two-foot model was from its very inception intended to serve as a full worthy [filming model](/wiki/Studio_model).

It was therefore outfitted with internal lighting, though that was limited to the warp engines, navigational lights and [deflector dish](/wiki/Deflector_dish).

As for the windows, Visual Effects Associate [Eric Alba](/wiki/Eric_Alba) has observed, “This model is different from the 4 and 6 footer in that there were no electronic lights built into the windows.Rather, 3M reflective tape was placed where windows were and were illuminated with a simple lamp.[[12]]http://www.flickr.com/photos/alba/2198868/in/set-72157622007016548/ Michael Okuda later added in this respect, “I should clarify that while the 2′ Enterprise didn’t have interior window lights, it did have little bits of retroreflective tape for the windows.

This ingenious technique wasn’t as effective as internal neon lighting, but it did allow for the illusion of internal lights on models that were too small for neon.

The glow from retroreflective tape (like the lettering on many highway signs) was often dimmer and sometimes did not show up well in the original video composites.” [[13]]https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/observations/wherenoonehasgonebefore.htm

Reportedly, the construction costs for both the two-foot and six-foot models, came in at around US$75,000.(

[Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Companion_(3rd_edition)) (3rd ed., p.12)) Two internal memos from Associate Producer [Peter Lauritson](/wiki/Peter_Lauritson), one dated [1 April](/wiki/1_April) [1987](/wiki/April_1987) were the costs were stated to be US$72,750, and one dated [12 May](/wiki/12_May) [1987](/wiki/May_1987) where they were adjusted upwards to US$73,663 ($77,479 including tax), gave an impression how the costs developed.[[14]]http://startrekpropauthority.com/2011/04/star-trek-tng-filming-models-2-hour.html As a comparison, the single [Motion Picture Enterprise model](/wiki/Constitution_II_class_model#Eight-foot_motion_pictures_model) constructed nine years earlier came in at double that price.

Use

Upon completion, the model was turned over to ILM’s

[David Carson](/wiki/David_Carson_(ILM))’s film crew for filming the intricate “going-to-warp” sequences in conjuncture with the big model.Additional footage was shot at Paramount Pictures for the pilot episode and at Image G afterwards, until the advent of the four-foot model early in [TNG Season 3](/wiki/TNG_Season_3), after which the model was retired though stock footage remained utilized throughout the remainder of the series.

One way of distinguishing the two-foot model from its larger counterpart, at least in the more static shots, were the front, port and starboard running lights on the saucer.These were far more pronounced on the smaller model, as the light bulbs used were large in relation to the scale of the model.Apart from this, there was less overall lighting, especially on the ventral side of the saucer section, partly for the technical reasons as touched upon by Michael Okuda.

For the

[remastered](/wiki/TNG-R) version of The Next Generation, some of these deficiencies were corrected (see [below](/wiki/Galaxy_class_model#The_remastered_edition)).Okuda clarified, “Today’s digital compositing tools offer more flexibility, so are sometimes able to pull more detail out of the tiny retroreflective windows.” [[15]]https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/observations/wherenoonehasgonebefore.htm The remastered version has also made it easier to discern the pronounced separation lines between the saucer and secondary hull, which were far more pronounced on the six-foot model due to that model’s two-part construction.

A notable appearance of the two-foot model occurred in “

[11001001](/wiki/11001001_(episode))” in the scene where the Enterprise-D approaches [Starbase 74](/wiki/Starbase_74).Explaining the scene from a cost-saving point of view, Robert Legato related: “One week the Enterprise was supposed to visit a space station, so we constructed it around stock footage we have access to.

We took some footage from one of the four [features](/wiki/Star_Trek_films) and used the background with the space station in it.We then matted in the new Enterprise, following the exact movement of the old Enterprise.So it had a lot of production value, but what it cost was the expense of compositing those shots as opposed to building a space station and setting up the shot from scratch.You use what you got, and disguise it a bit.We do that quite a lot.” ( [Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 19, issue 3, p.33) Image G’s [Tom Barron](/wiki/Tom_Barron), delving a bit deeper into the technological aspects of the scene, elaborated:

“For one episode, we had the new Enterprise fly into the background footage

[drydock]used in [Star Trek III: The Search for Spock]– and what we wound up doing was running a tape of the movie and matching the moves and angles of the old ILM shot by using [split screen]comparison mix.We matched the interactive light as well.

Like everything else, we shot the moves on half-inch JVC video recorder and then ran the tape over to [Rob]and [Dan]who gave us suggestions and approval.” ( [Cinefex], issue 37, p.21)

The creative use of this stock footage did not meet everyone’s approval as Probert’s later observation showed:

“Going into the Spacedock was ludicrous, and I was fighting tooth and nail to get them to not do that.

The producers simply shrugged their shoulders and said, “Well, we’ll say it’s a bigger Spacedock,” but that logic really didn’t work for me.The system that I proposed was that the Enterprise to be serviced and docked on the existing space station’ exterior, because it has an umbrella-like rim – a mushroom head, if you will – under which the Enterprise could have been docked by connecting the dorsal replenishment systems, but…There’s a lot of things that sort of fell by the wayside, and it is what it is.”

[[16]]

Probert eventually produced a matte-painting that was used to show the Enterprise-D docked inside Starbase 74.At Image G a close-up shot was taken of the six-foot model, combined with a

[maquette](/wiki/Maquette) of the gangway, which was especially constructed for the occasion.The shot was printed on a plate and sent to Probert, who produced the interior of the station and incorporated the ship plate in his painting, adding touch-ups on the ship and gangway.

Footage of people walking through the gangway as well as the addition of a passing [shuttle drone](/wiki/Shuttle_drone) were added in post-production.[[17]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/11001001-starbase-74-matte-painting http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/11001001-starbase-74-matte-painting

The current wherabouts of the two-foot model are unknown.Unlike its larger counterparts, it has not yet appeared in any auctions or exhibitions.

Filming the six and two-foot models

Originally only contracted to build the two studio models, ILM was able to secure an additional commission to do visual effects photography for the pilot as well including shooting effects shots of the Enterprise-D model(s).David Carson remembered, “They sent us a tape of clips of the old TV show, about 40 of them, different fly-bys: bank left, bank right, comes close, goes far away, etc.They pretty much covered their needs.Their intention was to draw from this library of basic shots wherever appropriate throughout the 24-episode season.Elements we shot could be matted into a variety of backgrounds which could either be pulled from the features or new backgrounds to be produced.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2](/wiki/The_Official_Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Magazine_issue_2), pp.

28-29)

Going-to-warp sequences

The first order of business was getting the going-to-warp sequence of the new starship for the title sequence of the new series on film, as envisioned by Robert Justman.In a final proposal to Roddenberry, he worded the main title sequence as “As narration finishes, the warp engines suddenly glow brightly and the Enterprise hurtles away from us, accelerating into warp speed.The ship seems to stretch longitudinally in a kind of “rubber band” effect as the forward part of its image pulls away from the rear part.A beat later, the rear part of the image snaps forward and rejoins the part.” (

[Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 5](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Magazine_Volume_1,_Issue_5), p.11)

As difficult it was to come up with the concept (Justman had an even more difficult time coming up with the opening sequence for the

[Star Trek: The Original Series](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)), executing the effect was even more difficult.It was at this time newly appointed Visual Effects Coordinator Rob Legato stepped in:

“ILM was also instrumental in providing us with the rubber band warp-out effect.Though it looks like a video effect, it was done on film.The idea is that the Enterprise stretches out or elongates as it goes into warp drive.

Then as it reaches its speed, it snaps back like a rubber band and goes off into the distance.I read that

[Douglas Trumbull]had tried to do something similar on Star Trek: The Motion Picture, but was unable to get it together in time.No one had ever [slitscanned]a three-dimensional model before and he encountered terrible problems using a literal slit moving in front of his camera lens.I came up with the alternative idea of scanning a slit of light across a two-foot model.

The camera would be positioned very close to the tail of the Enterprise while a projected sliver of light swept across the surface from the rear to the front.As the light scanned forward, the camera would open onto the film.

By the time the camera reached the end of its track, the sliver of light had reached the front of the Enterprise-now fifteen feet away and very tiny in the frame-creating the effect of a stretched starship.By repositioning the start and stop points of the camera, the image of the Enterprise could be made to literally stretch and collapse on demand.” ( [Cinefex], issue 37, pp.6, 8)

On another occasion Legato said:

“We thought that we could just do a streak effect as had been done in the films.But I came up with an idea one morning, phoned the FX supervisor at ILM; it sounded good to him and he wanted to try it.

We create the effect by moving a slit of light across the model, while the camera is moving backwards.

This technique makes the image stretch as if it’s made out of rubber.The first test looks great, bur there are technical problems.There are certain lighting conditions in which this effect will work, mostly side lighting.You have to have a fill slit, too, so the model doesn’t jump into a completely different lighting set-up.For the effect, the model is only illuminated by the slit, so the model would suddenly switch to all key light and no fill.

On Star Trek, the convention has always been to use a great amount of fill light, much more than would really exist in space.So, we had to come up with a traveling fill slit moving at the same time, but we found that we could only get it to work in certain situations.We would love to do more warp shots, but they are very very time-consuming, and therefore, expensive.” (

[Starlog], issue 132, p.56)

Once the details were worked out it was left to ILM’s John Knoll to actually create the sequence.Having to work with both models, the innovative technique was not without its flaws:

“The original effect was done using motion control and slit-scan, which was really the only thing that was practical at the time.The problem with slit-scan approach, which involved projecting a slit of light onto the model from front to back, was that we couldn’t have rim light, all the light had to come directly from the side, and we couldn’t do slit-scan on a light pass.

If you analyze the warpdrive stretch in the TV show, you’ll notice that the portholes go off as soon as the stretch starts! It worked fine for what the TV show intended to do, but today it just barely holds up, even on television.” (

[American Cinematographer], April 1995, p.87)

The “blinking-off”, Knoll refers to, is the transition of the six-foot model to the two-foot model after the flash of light of the warp-engines in the sequence, that also conveniently served to disguise the transition.

[[18]]http://www.trekplace.com/article05.html ILM’s Bill George later further clarified, “One of the reasons that flash occurs in the opening credits when the ship goes into warp is because we switched from the six-foot model to the two-foot model.We used the two-foot model for the stretch effect, and the six-foot model for the fly-by.Well, they didn’t quite match, so that’s why the flash is there – to cover the fact that when we’re switching from one model to the other, we kind of used it to cover the discrepancies between the two models.” ( [Star Trek Generations](/wiki/Star_Trek_Generations_(novel)) (hardback), pp.271-272)

At the time shooting these sequences was a very expensive and time-consuming technique, requiring several minutes per frame and tying up valuable camera and stage time for hours or even days.Thus only three “going-to-warp” sequences were ever made by ILM, to be utilized throughout the remainder of the series.

(

[Cinefex](/wiki/Cinefex), issue 37, p.8) Carson mused at the time:

“When the studio asked us to create the distortion effect, we discussed several possible techniques.On the same day, one of our guys up here and Rob Legato at Paramount both began to pursue the same technical approach.We found that while it wouldn’t be easy, it would be possible.There are only three shots in the first episode where it needs to make the jump.It looks pretty good.

I don’t know how feasible it’s going to be on a continuing basis to have this jump to light speed; it isn’t an easily achieved effect.Of the three shots we did, I suppose one of them could conceivably be used in a stock situation, but so much depends on the script.Usually, when the ships jumps.it’s because it is in trouble or something is chasing it or whatever.It remains to be seen how generic the jump we’ve done for “Farpoint” is.” (

[The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2], p.38)

Legato himself added a simplified sequence, shot on the Paramount Pictures lot itself, “Three warp shots were created at ILM, and one was done here at Paramount.

The one we did was a simpler shot of the Enterprise as seen in full profile.

When you see the ¾ back shots, the effect needs to be created three-dimensionally; in the profile shot, you get by with doing it two-dimensionally using normal slitscan techniques.” (

[Starlog](/wiki/Starlog), issue 132, pp.55-56) Partly because it was easier and partly because ILM was busy filming the six-foot model, Legato made use of the two-foot model for this warp-sequence as well as for filming some additional stock-footage.( [The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2](/wiki/The_Official_Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Magazine_issue_2), p.41) Legato’s warp sequence was not utilized in the pilot episode, but showed up for the first time in the episode ” [Where No One Has Gone Before](/wiki/Where_No_One_Has_Gone_Before_(episode))”.

These four shots were later supplemented by two more sequences Legato had made for “

[The Nth Degree](/wiki/The_Nth_Degree_(episode))” using the same technique.( [American Cinematographer](/wiki/American_Cinematographer), January 1992, p.

87)

Stock footage

Once the “going-to-warp” sequences were completed, attention could be directed to shooting stock footage.ILM took on the task of shooting this footage of the six-foot model.The studio made most of the situation as Carson recalled, “So, whenever possible, we extended the shorts that they needed.For Instance, if they needed a shot of the Enterprise that might be only three or four seconds long for this episode, they would ask us to start the shot much further away and finish the shot much closer, so that we might deliver a 20-second shot, They could use the portion needed for that episode, and hopefully use other parts of the shot or the expanded shot for future episodes as well.(…) Additionally, we provided elements that could be used in more than one situation.In some cases, for example, where they asked for one element with a shadow pass over it, we would also provide an element that had no shadow on it, so they could use it in later shots.”, Effects Manager

[Patricia Blau](/wiki/Patricia_Blau) added.

( [The Official Star Trek: The Next Generation Magazine issue 2](/wiki/The_Official_Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Magazine_issue_2), p.29)

While ILM was busy composing a library of stock footage of the six-foot model, Robert Legato had other plans with the two-foot model.Feeling that it was impractical to have ILM produce everything on the pilot or eventual follow-ups, he decided to look elsewhere for additional visual effects suppliers.Legato was a former employee of visual effects provider Image G, and approached them with a request to produce effects for the second regular episode, “

[The Naked Now](/wiki/The_Naked_Now_(episode))”.

Tom Barron recalled its first acquaintance with the franchise: “One day [Rob](/wiki/Robert_Legato) came in the back door with this [rock](/wiki/File:SS_Tsiolkovsky-core_fragment.jpg)! He literally comes knocking on the door and says, “Hey look, you guys shoot stuff and you got spare time in your schedule.Shoot me this thing.” I’m not exactly the most aggressive executive producer around, and we didn’t have anything else going on that day, so we shot it.” Barron’s company shot footage of the two-foot model and the [Oberth-class studio model](/wiki/Oberth_class_model) dressed as the [SS Tsiolkovsky](/wiki/SS_Tsiolkovsky) as a courtesy to Legato.( [Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 3, Issue 1](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Magazine_Volume_3,_Issue_1), pp.60-61) Image G eventually became tthe regular provider of motion control photography shots from the second episode onward until the technique was no longer employed in the television franchise.

Discounting the going-to-warp sequences, ILM and Paramount between them produced a library of about forty effects shots of the two models for the pilot.The producers’ idea was to use this library for all the ships shots, much like it was done for The Original Series, as a cost saving measure.

“The plan was to take the library shots from ILM and add about five per show”, Legato said (referring to all VFX shots, not only the ship ones), adding a bit ruefully, “That was probably a little naive…The pilot needed two hundred and ten shots, the second show had seventy-five, the third eighty, and so on, so by the sixth or seventh show we found it was cheaper just to “trick” (custom shoot) each one out.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Companion_(3rd_edition)) (3rd ed., p.31)) More specifically in regard to the Enterprise-D he elaborated, “The ILM method never really panned out.In no time you’ve run through all the shots and they’re all dull, because they don’t move.We generally shoot new things for each show.

After a while you have so many different variations that you can do it.” Having made the comment at the end of [TNG Season 4](/wiki/TNG_Season_4), the library had by then been augmented by Image G to more than 350 shots.( [Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 22, issue 2, p.

33)

The remastered edition

In 2012 a start was made with the release of the

[remastered](/wiki/TNG-R) version of The Next Generation television series, starting with [Star Trek: The Next Generation – The Next Level sampler Blu-ray Disc](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_-_The_Next_Level).

Like its predecessor, the [remastered Original Series](/wiki/TOS-R), intent of the project was to upgrade the original footage to 1080p high-definition, to meet [Blu-ray Disc](/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc) standards.Unlike its predecessor none of the visual effects were slated for replacement with newly conceived [computer generated imagery](/wiki/CGI), or as Project Consultant Mike Okuda has put, it, “We love the approach that [CBS](/wiki/CBS_Studios) took for this project.We take the original film elements and put them together in a new way.The material still has all the details and they are beautiful.And the new visual effects are really the old visual effects but a lot more beautiful than you have ever seen them.” [[19]]https://blog.trekcore.com/2012/01/tng-r-first-season-blu-ray-trailer-appears-online

The newly composited, enhanced, and color-corrected footage has resulted in far more detailed imagery.For example the hull paneling, including the duck-egg blue highlights, on the Enterprise is better discernible.The project also brought out details that were present in the original film but which did not show up on the original master prints, such as the dim lighting on the ventral side on the footage of the two-foot model.

Some use of CGI was made however, but that was restricted to correcting continuity errors, such as the “blinking-off” issue, mentioned above, or for replacing original elements that were either technically impossible to upgrade or simply lost.An example of the latter case occurred for the episode “

[Booby Trap](/wiki/Booby_Trap_(episode))” where a missing shot of the aft of the six-foot model was replaced with one utilizing a CGI model.

Costs of filming the studio models

The aforementioned Lauritson memos (which were part of of the lots sold on 27 June 2002 in

[Profiles in History](/wiki/Profiles_in_History)’s [The Bob Justman Star Trek Auction](/wiki/The_Bob_Justman_Star_Trek_Auction)) also provided some insight into the costs incurred of filming the models for the pilot episode.On 12 May 1987 the motion control photography costs were projected as [[20]]http://www.startrekpropauthority.com/2011/04/star-trek-tng-filming-models-2-hour.html:

– Miniature Photography (library shots) (includes warp test and video composting)

– US$169,200 ($180,198 including tax)

of which were:

– Build Split-Apart Model Section [remark: The partial “Battle Head” model–see below–for the saucer separation sequence]

– US$15,000 ($15,975 including tax)

– All “Enterprise” and “Hood” Photography (headed as “Motion Control Photography (40 Shots)” on the April 1st memo)

– US$63,000 ($67,095 including tax, adjusted upwards from US$62,200 of the April 1st memo)

Four-foot model

During the break in filming between season two and three of the The Next Generation series the Visual Effects Producers made a conscious decision to have an intermediate sized studio model of the Enterprise-D made for practical reasons, what was eventually to become known as the “four-foot” model.

Raison d’être

Overriding practical reasons for doing this occupied the minds of the producers and they were mainly two-fold, as Dan Curry explained:

“We had the six-footer and we also had the two-footer, and something that must have intellectually interesting to Andy was the idea of this perfectly smooth ship that was absolutely huge, and if you saw it in person the scale would be rapidly apparent.But when we photographed the big ship very smooth, we couldn’t tell the difference between it and a very small ship very smooth, because photographically, particularly on television and in order to create that sense of scale and hugeness, we needed three-dimensional relief, something to cast shadows.That’s why we built the four-footer.And also because the six-footer was really too big to be manageable, particularly when we shot matte passes, where you have enough lit cared behind the ship to obtain a silhouette.(…) So if you had a big move going around it, it would sometimes take a day to get the matte pass because the ship was so huge.

And the four-footer turned out to be a more manageable size.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints],booklet, p.9)

Echoing Curry’s statement, colleague Ron B.Moore has added, “When we started TNG we had two models of the Enterprise-D.One was six feet long and looked really great.We could take the saucer off, though not without a lot of effort.

The other was a two-foot model that didn’t look so good up close but was great for distant shots.Somewhere around the third season Rob Legato had a third model built.It was four feet and was a great compromise.It gave us a lot more flexibility in shooting the models.From that point on most of our models were at that scale or smaller.” (

[Flying Starships](/wiki/Flying_Starships), p.35) As to underscore the remarks Curry made about the manageability of the six-foot model, a private behind-the-scenes video shot by Gary Hutzel demonstrated that it took six people to move that model around.”It takes six guys just to take it of the stand and turn it over, and those guys are wetting themselves with fear, because you drop this or a nacelle breaks or something, you could set the company back.”, Doug Drexler jokingly commented.[[21]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/drex-tv-02 http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/drex-tv-02 On a more serious note, Rob Legato additionally commented, “I didn’t agree with the idea of making the model that big originally.

It made shooting difficult because you couldn’t get back far enough.[remark: Legato refers to the space limitations at Image G where the camera, due of the size of the model could not be retracted enough to get forced perspective shots] And there was no detail on it, Detail was drawn on in pencil.You can’t get close to it, so there’s no reason to have it that large.” ( [Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 22, issue 2, pp.33-34) Legato went on explaining that the lighting system on the six-foot model was very cumbersome, needing a full hour just to set up the model for filming.Hutzel devised an on-board neon transformer for the new four-foot model, allowing the lighting scheme to be changed by flipping a few switches and avoiding being electro-shocked, as he was by the big model.

The four-foot model was also useful for close-ups as well as for forced perspective shots, thereby eliminating the need to switch between the two-, and six-foot models at Image G resulting in significant time savings.

This versatility of the four-foot model rendered the original models virtually obsolete as they were almost never utilized again.

Build

Once the decision was made, the task of building the model fell upon

[Gregory Jein, Inc.](/wiki/Gregory_Jein), whose four-man team, which included, amongst others, [Bruce MacRae](/wiki/Bruce_MacRae) [[22]]http://www.jetcafe.org/bruce/portfolio/TV_Shows2/FrameSet.htm and [Dana White](/wiki/Dana_White_Shea), had to pull off all-nighters during the 1989 Thanksgiving season to have the model built in time.His team also received help from production staff associates [David Takemura](/wiki/David_Takemura) and Michael Okuda [[23]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/drex-tv-02/ http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/drex-tv-02/ and outside contractors [Ed Miarecki](/wiki/Ed_Miarecki) and [David Merriman, Jr.](/wiki/David_Merriman,_Jr.).Merriman recalled:

“Greg called, explaining the need for a smaller miniature, and asked if we had time to build a master of the warp engine and wing section of the secondary hull.

Later in L.A., our masters would be used to make molds and from those tools, the translucent GRP parts [remark: the transparent grills on either side of the nacelle] of the actual miniature.(…) The completed four foot long 1701-D was, of course, an amalgamation of work performed by several people.

Ellie [remark: Meriman’s wife] and I did the warp engine and wing structure masters.I understand that Edward [sic] Miarecki, the same guy who did the recent, and by far the best restoration of the TV

[1701 miniature], worked up the secondary hull master.Greg Jein farmed out the glass work to an outfit in Burbank and his crew did the primary hull, part assembly, painting, and weathering.” ( [Sci-Fi & Fantasy Models], issue 30, 1998, pp.36, 38)

Jein later related:

“When the series got a Go, they decided that at that point they needed a smaller model so they could get their camera back farther and make it disappear into infinity faster.It was also decided at that point that they would have more detail on the ship and the model that we handled down here was about four feet long and it had a lot more surface detail, so the lights would create more details on the surface.

I have here a pattern for the nacelle and if you play it through the light you can see the detail that is inscribed into it.

(…) This is a big difference from the ILM size.” (

[TNG Season 3 DVD]-special feature, “Departmental Briefing, Year Three: Production”)

While proud of his and his team’s creation, Jein recalled the sense of relief they felt upon the model’s completion.”I remember when we finished work on the 4-foot miniature version of the U.S.S.Enterprise (there are several version of the starship, from 6-foot long down to only a few centimeters), we filled a thin glass grape mold with sparkling soda and “christened” the ship/model.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation – Behind the Scenes](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_-_Behind_the_Scenes), backside card 26)

Though intended to represent the same vessel, there were some other differences between the six and four-foot models as well.In order to address Curry’s concerns, the surface details were slightly raised whereas the surface on the big model was smooth.”They wanted a more realistic look than the smooth surface of the initial Enterprise.We devised a thin layer of what we call ‘plating’-raised surfaces.

With rim light you can eventually see it’s not a flat surface.There are actually levels of detail.”, Jein elaborated.(

[Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 23 issue 2/3, p.95) Additionally the layout and size of some of the windows on the leading edge of the saucer section were slightly altered, to reflect the location of [Ten Forward](/wiki/Ten_Forward), introduced during the run of the [second season](/wiki/TNG_Season_2), as envisioned by Mike Okuda in October 1988.Also the saucer rim was somewhat thicker, which also applied to the shape of the secondary hull that was most discernible in the deflector dish assembly area as well as the dish itself.These alterations were designed to address the issue of the Ten Forward set not having been built to scale down correctly to the window detailing of the forward rim of the six-foot model ( [citation needed](/wiki/Memory_Alpha:Cite_your_sources) • edit), and it resulted in a model that had a slightly “stockier” appearance.Finally the base hull color was shifted to a lighter blue- almost white-gray tone, though that had negligible effects under shooting conditions.

A final, small difference, only discernible in close-ups, was the deflector dish.Aside from the overall shape, the large model had a central detail feature on which were sported two horizontally aligned circular features.These were lacking on the four-foot model, as they were on the two-foot model.

Like the small two-foot model, this model also was built without the capability of saucer separation.

The slightly altered look received some mixed reactions as evidenced by a remark Dan Curry made:

“I love the shape of the Enterprise.It’s fluid, it’s elegant, it’s got a sleekness to it.The fact that the saucer is not a circle but an ellipse reminds me of Trojan shields.It presented an engineering challenge, for sure, with all the stresses that the armature inside has to take, but I also think it presented a real opportunity.

With the six-footer, most of us like the sculptural proportions a little bit better than on the four-footer.The four-footer is a bit more of a bulldog; it’s stockier, whereas the six-footer really has a sleek elegance about it.” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Blueprints], booklet, pp.9-10)

Use

Debuting in “The Defector” (

[Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation_Companion_(3rd_edition)) (3rd ed., p.99)), it was this model that was almost exclusively used for any newly shot footage for the remainder of the series.The model was never relabeled nor modified for The Next Generation series to represent other vessels until the finale ” [All Good Things…](/wiki/All_Good_Things…_(episode))” were it was extensively modified to represent the [anti-time future](/wiki/Anti-time_future) variant.

Intensive use was made of the four-foot model at Image G for the episode “

[Parallels](/wiki/Parallels_(episode))” where the appearance of thousands of Enterprises was called for.Effects Supervisor for the episode Ronald B.Moore recalled:

“The writer

[Brannon Braga]contacted me and asked if it would be possible to show hundreds and thousands of Enterprises in the same shot.

He was worried because he knew that if it cost too much the effect could end up being scaled down, which often happens.A script might start out asking for a fleet of hundreds of ships but then it becomes dozens and finally we’re viewing this incredible fleet from the rear so the three leading ships are all we see.Brannon thought the effect was important so he wanted us to be prepared.

It sounded interesting so I told him that we could do it within our budget.Then I had to figure out a way to do it!”

Options Moore considered were using a

[matte painting](/wiki/Matte_painting) (“I decided against that because I didn’t think it would have the right texture, and I wanted to have real lights on all the ships.

I think the lights of the Enterprise are one of the most striking things about the ship and I didn’t want to lose that.”), hanging multiple models of the ship on wires (he decided against that as the slightest disturbance would cause the models to bounce around like “Christmas tree ornaments”) and using existing stock footage which would not do because, “(…)the lighting on the ships would have been different for every one, and I needed them to look consistent.” ( [Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol.25, No.6/Vol.26, issue 1, pp.54-55)

CGI not yet being an alternative at the time, Moore eventually bowed to the inevitable:

“I finally bit the bullet and shot hundreds of Enterprises at Image G.I’d do one version, rotate the Enterprise slightly and then do the next one and the one after that until I’d photographed it from every angle I could.Then I turned the model upside down and repeated it.It took a long time to get all the elements I needed because each ship had to be filmed with multiple passes, but I felt it was worthwhile because every ship in the shot is the actual Enterprise, which is the whole point of the shot.Then I added them to the frame, starting with those that were furthest from the camera.These were so small I pretty much rubber stamped from the different versions I created.As I worked forward I added more variety in terms of movement and orientation, until the screen was filled with Enterprises.”

Despite the enormous amount of work the shot was delivered on time and on budget and received high praise from the producers, though Moore had an even more ambitious shot in mind, “Ideally I’d have loved to have done a sweeping camera move through all the Enterprises, but we didn’t have the time or the money for it.

It’s something you learn to accept when you work in television, because there are always those extra touches you wish you were able to do.” (

[Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol.25, issue 6/Vol.26, issue 1, p.55)

“All Good Things…”

For its future variant appearance in “All Good Things..” the four-foot model was endowed with various add-ons, designed in a collaborative effort by Dan Curry and Greg Jein.

Musing about how the Enterprise would look like twenty-five years in the future, Curry elaborated, “I took a model of the Enterprise, some clay and a few spare parts and began experimenting.Everyone had ideas and Greg Jein suggested adding the third engine that helps give the future Enterprise an unique look.

I sculpted a rough warp engine and added it to the model.I was very crude, like something a child would do, but we showed that to executive producer Rick Berman who thought we were headed in the right direction.Once we had Rick’s approval, Greg went to work on it.” (

[Cinefantastique](/wiki/Cinefantastique), Vol 25 issue 6/Vol 26 issue 1, p.67) Using the molds he had of the studio model, Greg cast a third warp nacelle assembly which also included two additional impulse engines.The 21″ × 10″ × 4.5″ part, constructed around a metal armature and rigged throughout the inside with electronics and halogen bulbs for internal lighting, was attached to the spine of the secondary hull.

Other parts that Jein’s shop manufactured to complete the transfiguration into a future variant were the phaser canon assembly on the ventral side of the saucer, the twin torpedo launcher and two antenna like features aft and on either side of the bridge module respectively, phaser strip assemblies on top of either port and starboard warp nacelle and “speed” fins on both nacelle struts.

Doug Drexler recalled an in-joke having been performed on the model by Jein’s staff when he visited the completed model on stage, “I remember going down to “G” with Mike and

[Denise](/wiki/Denise_Okuda) to see the Future D on the stick.I recall that the ship had a tiny bumper sticker on its tail that said “I Heart Uranus” [[24]]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152315762786104&set=a.10152315757051104.1073742117.570346103&type=3&theater,” – though a picture from Eric Alba later showed up where it could be discerned that the sticker actually read, “We Heart Uranus”.[[25]]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=115327272857&set=a.10153617954667858&type=3&theater

The thirteen modification parts, constructed out of fiberglass re-enforced resin, were removable and as one-time only pieces normally slated for discarding.However, Visual Effects Supervisor Gary Hutzel, who genuinely loved the traditional methods of visual effects production, could not bring himself to let these parts go, and saved them from the dumpster, keeping them in storage for two decades.

[[26]]http://startrekauction.blogspot.nl/2014/10/doug-drexler-previews-gary-hutzel.html Ultimately though, Hutzel offered these pieces up as Lot 1 at auction in [Propworx](/wiki/Propworx)’ [Star Trek Auction V](/wiki/Star_Trek_auctions#Star_Trek_Auction_V) of 30 May 2015, where they sold for US$9,500 ($11,210 with buyer’s premium), having had an estimate of $3,000–$5,000.[[27]]http://startrekauction.blogspot.nl/2015/06/propworx-star-trek-auction-5-results.html

Final production uses

Following completion of “

[All Good Things…](/wiki/All_Good_Things…_(episode))” the model was relabeled for the first time as the [USS Odyssey](/wiki/USS_Odyssey) (NCC-71832) in the [Star Trek: Deep Space Nine](/wiki/Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine) [second season](/wiki/DS9_Season_2) episode ” [The Jem’Hadar](/wiki/The_Jem%27Hadar_(episode))”.

The relabeling was done by Doug Drexler at the Art Department, who elaborated, “Occasionally if a miniature needed graphic retouching, VFX would arrange to have the teamsters pick the model up [note: from Image G] and bring it to the art department.That was always a big event, because the ships were our idea of celebrities.They, more than anything, seemed to embody what the show was all about…symbolic of Human aspiration and ingenuity.” [[28]]https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/art-dept-fleet-yard http://www.drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/art-dept-fleet-yard

Believing that the model had reached its end as an useful production asset, the studio released the model (labeled back to USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D) for public relations purposes, appearing for the first time as a display piece in the February 1995 opening leg of the

[Star Trek: The Exhibition](/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Exhibition) tour in Edinburgh, UK.( [Sci-Fi & Fantasy Models](/wiki/Sci-Fi_%26_Fantasy_Models), issue 6, p.

24) Still, Visual Effects Supervisors [Glenn Neufeld](/wiki/Glenn_Neufeld) and Gary Hutzel had one more use for the model in mind for the [fourth season](/wiki/DS9_Season_4) episode ” [The Way of the Warrior](/wiki/The_Way_of_the_Warrior_(episode))” and the model (along with the [Negh’Var studio model](/wiki/Negh%27Var_warship#Studio_models)) was hurriedly pulled from the tour in May 1995.

Labeled [USS Venture](/wiki/USS_Venture_(NCC-71854)) (NCC-71854), the model was featured at the end of the episode as part of a relief force, interestingly sporting the phaser assemblies on the nacelles as featured in “All Good Things…”, albeit in a reversed orientation and applied to the model by Hutzel, who had earlier taken the parts under his wing.

Its performance in the episode proved to be the very last time the four-foot model – or any of the physical studio models – was used as a production asset.The next new-footage appearance of a Galaxy class vessel in “

[Call to Arms](/wiki/Call_to_Arms_(episode))” was already being executed as a CGI effect.[[29]]https://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.startrek.tech/msg/b7b8c22921513d79?hl=nl

Post-production “odyssey” of the four-foot model

The four-foot model came very close to sharing the fate of its illustrious predecessor, the three-foot Constitution class studio model.Eager to get in on the hype surrounding the

Planet Hollywood restaurant franchise craze around 1995, the studio immediately loaned out the model in its USS Venture livery to the new.

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

New technology helps fight varroa as beekeeper monitors bees’ health from far

Menino de oito anos fica três dias com porca de parafuso no ouvido por não conseguir atendimento médico – Pais

Facebook’s $237.6 billion drop in value sets all-time record

Four provincial governments are pushing ahead with

kacha badam: A little more than peanuts? After online outrage, ‘Kacha Badam’ singer receives long due remuneration, gets Rs 3 lakh from music label – The Economic Times

Ezekiel Elliott uses new technology to tee his ‘A’ game – CBS DFW

Was GTA V Enhanced a missed opportunity from Rockstar for a Nintendo Switch version?

Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer wants to ‘keep Call of Duty on PlayStation’ – The Verge

6 Best Free Website Builders to Check Out in 2023 [+Pros & Cons]

Winnipeg-based manufacturer wins contract to make buses for Toronto Transit Commission

Sony said to bolster PlayStation, buying Destiny game maker Bungie for $3.6 billion – CNET

COVID long haulers see new hope from advanced lung-scanning technology

Galaxy class model

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

How to Find Royalty Free Images for Your WordPress Blog Posts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You May Like

Subscribe US Now