Owen Paterson: Boris Johnson’s actions corrupt – Starmer

admin

imageOwen Paterson: Boris Johnson’s actions corrupt – Starmer Published

6

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Labour leader Keir Starmer ‘angry’ that Boris Johnson is ‘trashing our democracy’ over Paterson case Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer has accused the PM of “corrupt and contemptible” behaviour in trying to “protect” Tory MP Owen Paterson, after he was found to have broken lobbying rules.

Sir Keir told the BBC the government was “trashing” the UK’s reputation for upholding democratic standards.

Mr Paterson has now quit as an MP.

Ministers backed plans to change the standards system that found Mr Paterson guilty but changed their minds the next day, following a political outcry.

The vote to reform the rules – backed by MPs on Wednesday – also put on hold a 30-day House of Commons suspension Mr Paterson was facing for breaching the rules by lobbying on behalf of two private companies.

But Environment Secretary George Eustice defended the government’s position, saying it had been trying to give politicians under investigation the right to appeal against any findings against them – rather than protect Mr Paterson.

He told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show: “We’ve been consistent on this throughout.”

Paterson row: How did PM score spectacular own goal? What did Owen Paterson do? What does ‘sleaze’ mean when politicians use it? Starmer calls for convicted MP to quit Commons Sir Keir told the same programme: “Instead of upholding standards, [the prime minister] ordered his MPs to protect his mate and rip up the whole system.

“That’s corrupt and it’s contemptible and it’s not a one-off.”

On Saturday, former Conservative Prime Minister Sir John Major said the current government had been “politically corrupt” over its treatment of the House of Commons, adding: “There’s a general whiff of ‘We are the masters now’ about their behaviour.”

Analysis By Ione Wells, political correspondent

Sir Keir Starmer’s anger was palpable, but it’s hardly unexpected.He’s the opposition leader, after all – and none of the opposition backed plans to overhaul the system in the first place.

More troubling for the government is the frustration among its own MPs.Many put their necks on the line to do as their bosses told, some against their will.

Some who considered abstaining, I’m told, were reminded of positions they held that could be taken away.

The relationship between MPs and those at the top has been left bruised.This could bite the government when it needs those MPs on side again in future votes, particularly on controversial issues.

The Mail of Sunday quotes Shipley MP Philip Davies pleading, “Please don’t ever ask me to vote for anything ever again,” after claiming he received abuse from his constituents for it.

A signal, perhaps, of more tricky votes ahead for ministers.

Sir Keir said: “Boris Johnson is the prime minister who is leading his troops through the sewer – he’s up to his neck in this.”

Speaking earlier on Sky News, Labour’s shadow House of Commons leader, Thangham Debbonaire, urged Mr Johnson to “consider his position”.

She also described the position of Commons leader Jabob Rees-Mogg – who had to announce the government’s U-turn on Thursday – as “untenable”.

Asked about these comments on the Andrew Marr Show, Sir Keir said: “As the opposition, we always want this government to go.”

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, George Eustice: The vote wasn’t to reject the report that was put together; the vote was to establish an appeals process On Wednesday, Conservative MPs blocked the Standards Committee’s recommendation that Mr Paterson should be suspended by calling for an overhaul of the MPs’ standards watchdog instead.

They initially had the backing of No 10, but Downing Street changed its mind after a backlash by opposition MPs and some Conservatives.

Speaking on Sky News, Mr Eustice acknowledged the government had “made a mistake” in trying to get Mr Paterson’s breach of lobbying rules re-examined by a new, Conservative-majority committee which would also consider the entire Commons standards regime.

He added: “What we have seen is a Westminster storm in a teacup.”

But senior Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood told BBC Radio 4’s The World this Weekend: “We’ve lost our way and we need to find our moral compass.”

“Good policy, good governance, leadership, statecraft – that’s what’s needed at the moment, rather than manipulating the system for our own survival,” he added.

Mr Paterson, who denies breaking the rules, said in his resignation statement that he now wanted a life “outside the cruel world of politics”.

His departure will trigger a by-election in the North Shropshire seat he has held since 1997.

What did Owen Paterson do? Image source, House of Commons Image caption, Owen Paterson watched on in the Commons as MPs debated whether to suspend him Owen Paterson has been a paid consultant for clinical diagnostics company Randox since 2015 and to meat distributor Lynn’s Country Foods since 2016, earning a total of £100,000 a year on top of his MP’s salary.

MPs are allowed to have these jobs, but are not allowed to be paid advocates – using their influence in Whitehall for the company’s gain.

The committee concluded that Mr Paterson had breached this rule on paid advocacy by:

Making three approaches to the Food Standards Agency relating to Randox and the testing of antibiotics in milk Making seven approaches to the Food Standards Agency relating to Lynn’s Country Foods Making four approaches to ministers at the Department for International Development relating to Randox and blood testing technology.

Mr Paterson was also found to have broken conduct rules by:

Failing to declare his interest as a paid consultant to Lynn’s Country Foods in four emails to officials at the Food Standards Agency Using his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for business meetings with his clients And in sending two letters relating to his business interests, on House of Commons headed notepaper.A full guide to the controversy

Who’s who in the Owen Paterson row?

Related Topics House of Commons Keir Starmer Tobias Ellwood Boris Johnson Owen Paterson Chris Bryant Lobbying More on this story Ex-PM condemns government’s ‘shameful’ actions

Published 1 day ago Paterson U-turn right thing to do, says minister

Published 2 days ago Labour rules out cross-party anti-sleaze candidate

Published 2 days ago Paterson quits as MP over lobbying row ‘nightmare’

Published 3 days ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

Technology set to redesign the future of food as agriculture moves towards net zero

Technology set to redesign the future of food as agriculture moves towards net zero [Daniel Mercer] On the east coast of Tasmania, the frigid waters and green landscape seem a world away from the blistering heat and red dirt of Western Australia’s Pilbara. Key points: – Australia’s farming industry has […]
Technology set to redesign the future of food as agriculture moves towards net zero

Subscribe US Now